Chinese mining firms in Zambia Favour Own Supply Chains , side stepping local businesses
Concerns have emerged regarding the business opportunities available to local Zambian contractors and suppliers within Chinese-operated mining ventures according to a confidential source who spoke exclusively to the Zambian Business Times (ZBT).
The source, whose identity has been withheld due to the sensitivity of the matter, detailed a
system where Chinese mining firms often establish intricate, self-sufficient supply chains. This reportedly involves Chinese companies subcontracting other Chinese-owned entities for various aspects of the mining operations.
“What they have done is they have now brought local contractors also in the name of Chinese who are running smaller businesses. They have become part of the supply chain,” the source explained. “So you find that Companies like CNMC will come and run the mine in terms of the bigger picture with the government, and then under them, you are going to have small Chinese businesses and all
those contractors, now who are going to be subcontracted. Then you are going to have below
them the suppliers of goods and services who are also going to be
Chinese.”
This structure, the source contends, results in a value chain dominated by Chinese interests, leaving minimal space for genuinely Zambian-owned businesses. The source further alleged that even locally registered entities can be effectively foreign-controlled, with foreign shareholders nominating local
directors.
“There is no law that prevents Zambian contractors or Zambian suppliers being registered, as foreign companies can come and nominate a local director that’s what the law provides for and you can have 100% foreign shareholders and control the business. There are locally registered but foreign owned,” the
source stated. They also indicated that the limited engagement of local suppliers at companies like CNMC primarily involves non-essential items. The source emphasized the critical need for a robust local content law to address this imbalance.
“We need a law because Chinese, what they respect is the law. In the absence of the law, they will tell you, ‘Where is it written that I should give you this kind of business?’ And remember, most of the companies are going to China to buy things, so they already know they have an advantage that these things are coming from themselves, so why should they give to X and Y when they know where they are found with cheaper customs?”
Furthermore, they highlighted what they described as “cultural differences,” where Chinese firms reportedly prefer to work with trusted partners, predominantly from their own country. “They say they have cultural differences, and with those cultural differences, they say they only work with the people they trust, which is themselves. So they are more comfortable dealing with the Chinese,” the source noted.
The limited scope of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) programs initiated by these firms was also mentioned. The source suggested that a government-to-government engagement, given state-owned nature, might be a more effective avenue for ensuring a greater trickle-down effect of investments to
local Zambian businesses.
“In the absence of the law and regulations, the Chinese will get 100%, that is just how they are.
You cannot tell them to say reason and give businesses to this one; no, it has to be by regulations,” the source concluded
Concerns have emerged regarding the business opportunities